Science & Absolute Truth

Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Wed, 06 May 1998 03:31:07 -0400


Ian Goddard <igoddard@erols.com> wrote:

>>... "true" is not an absolute and it's important to be careful
>>of how you use terms such as "true" and "false" because they are
>>presumed an absolute by both religious groups and some scientists.
>
>
> IAN: If there is no absolute truth, then that
> is an absolute truth, therefore there is an
> absolute truth. Therefore, the claim that
> there is no absolute truth must be false.

IAN: I was wondering if anyone would notice this,
since not, I'll note it: notice that there is one
answer that satisfies both opposite claims:

(1) There is no absolute truth.
(2) There is an absolute truth.

Answer: The absolute truth is zero. Then there
is both an absolute truth and no absolute truth.

Whole Truth http://www.erols.com/igoddard/truth.htm

********************************************************
Visit Ian W Goddard ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________
Statements T r u t h A defines -A
a -A defines A
A: x is A b A -A
l T F A set is defined
-A: x is -A e F T by its members, thus
? ? A & -A contain each other.
--------------------------------------------------------
H O L I S M ---> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/meta.htm
________________________________________________________