>> it could be that reflexive self-awareness is an
>> incidental computational by-product of very complex brained bodies
>> responding in complex ways (understanding, assessing, planning etc) to a
>> complex environment
>>implies that a relatively
>simple computer program, say CYC with its thousands of interrelated
>facts about the world, would be conscious to some degree. Such a
>program is far from being able to pass the Turing test
I don't know the details of CYC's code, but I had the impression that it's
basically just a big filing cabinet with links. Bodies with brains *have a
stake* in what they're doing with all that information they are processing.
The brain is *minding* the body. I think some of Edelman's (and Brooks')
bottom-up learners, with values gained or set from interactions with the
Real, offer better hope of emergent consciousness - but then again I
haven't heard any shouts of glee from their labs lately.
Damien Broderick