> I agree. Frankly I find you all terribly boring and hold many of you
> in utter contempt. But now and again among the S/N ratio moans, posts
A classical case of the pot calling the kettle black.
> about grammatical errors and authors promoting new books, there's a
> brightly shinning gem. And it's those ideas I'd like to see
> encouraged. Luckily most of the good ideas come from a few main
> sources (some of which aren't me!)
Indeed.
> So is anyone interesting in setting up an invitation-only list?
Too late. Has already occured.
> Choosing new list members would be the job of those already chosen by
> whomever wants to organise it. Maybe a web site could be set up for
> viewing (after the list member's controversial ramblings have been
> edited for public consumption) or an edited digest version sent out to
> the less fortunate non-members. We could also invite some "big names"
> in science, technology, art and (even) politics.
Of course.
> I would get an invitation for having the idea, of course.
Of course.
Good bye,
'gene
P.S. As my current workload has increased and the majordomo now seems
to be working I think I will bow out now -- thanks again to all
low-noise participants.
I would be very thankful is somebody of the transhumantech
participants would bounce any relevant material to
transhumantech.