Re: Plane crashes and other accidents
ChuckKuecker (ckuecker@mcs.net)
Sat, 18 Apr 1998 08:16:10 -0500 (CDT)
At 04:34 4/18/98 EDT, you wrote:
>
>The tubes could have gills in them, like in front of the craft the gills are
>open, so it wont create compressed air in front of it (or not as much), since
>it will escape into the outside air, and as the craft passes over the gills
>they become temporarily sealed to hold the seal-tight air bursts behind the
>craft, then they would have to be opened again for the next craft after the
>first craft passes the next charging station.
>The gills would have to be like super thin and lightweight (but still able to
>be sealed), so it wont create very much friction for the craft. Where and
>when to get out have to be worked out, like perhaps the tubes split, and they
>are diverted in a station, so it wont hold up the crafts behind it as they
>pass through.
>
>danny
This sounds like something that could be tried with a fairly low investment
= a couple of big shop vacuums and some large tubing. Perhaps we could build
a scale model for experimenting??
As far as shunting aside - there are existing diverter valves for pneumatic
mail delivery systems that could be tried...
I still am worried about frictional losses. All pneumatic systems lose a
good deal of energy due to compression heating of the working fluid..
Chuck Kuecker