Hal Finney wrote:
>Based on this rather cautious principle, I would tentatively classify
>the above procedures as moral, as long as they were done carefully so
>that suffering was minimized.
I'm dubious of this conclusion... By this premise, all of the above would
necessarily be moral if they were created in such a way that they were
always (artificially) happy, no matter how difficult or otherwise painful
their circumstances...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.5.3
iQEVAwUBNSvTm/JQm6Y3yAfNAQGM5wf/Qyr/IhNC0fge0pmstedB8Vd6MgfLycdB
DK6nEs0uYQP1i3TpbPLAVi8cF8xOk8WvifUG7wmQv7QSPPwZtMwJlcsURBDP+3h4
mCxeAY0huHULzDi8G4/Nd5qTa4ZwqFLZWzAQWvmhN4A12F5LGmQ5UF4UaAijMCOo
Le9nljsVLzp5jl7Y/EFmrUtsLkLFpmJBeDweuV4qP1g54dWAzy70FtwSnLU5r0Vd
hxEc4U0cunZOwSdXVofD8m+5bWHXzMhQlabCIc97qX8QK2Grs3j2iXqkMpH3AKwF
eMnka3BwuYHVT1mVzyEb/p6us2a9Hnp0XDdQaCnka0hNdKi42Kz6IA==
=NEWh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-TODAY IS A GOOD DAY TO LIVE-