Re: Fuel Cell House, was Re: TECH: fuel cell car

From: Robert Coyote (coyyote@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon May 07 2001 - 12:59:54 MDT


Ok so if it is organoleptically detectable in ridiculously low
concentrations, then what about not using human noses, what about electronic
sniffer chips standardised, cheaply mass produced, and manditory by law,
like smoke detectors?

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Robert Coyote wrote:

> If traditional odiferants cause problems in fuel cells, don't use
> traditional odiferants

Easier said than done. The whole point of using methylmercaptane is that
it is organoleptically detectable in ridiculously low concentrations.

More to the point, it is the standard additive to natural gas. You can
hence assume it as a design constant.

> surely someone can come up with substitutes...

May be, but how will you get people to use them?

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 10:00:03 MDT