Re: Tipler's Conjectures

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sat May 05 2001 - 11:22:50 MDT


I don't see why this is not possible? My only concern would be, is a cosmic
collapse, in the Charles Meissner sense of it, necessary to recover all the
photons, that would be used for a phase conservation re-gathering (in a
reverse determinism fashion) so, as, to re-create all past information?
Certainly, it seems that both Tipler's conjectures, and Hans Moravec's
conjectures, suggests that this is not a necessity!

Mitch

In a message dated 5/5/2001 7:57:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time, GBurch1@aol.com
writes:

<< I've only been skimming this thread and haven't thought deeply about the
 physics of "Tipler's Conjectures" since I read the book some years ago, but
 here's a question: Yes, it seems all the empirical evidence is mounting
 against a truly cosmic-scale implementation of Tipler's design for
 infinite/eternal computation, but could his design be implemented on a
 smaller scale? In other words, just because the cosmos in toto won't
 collapse, couldn't a local region be structured for asymetrical collapse to
 achieve the same result?
 
        Greg Burch <GBurch1@aol.com>----<gburch@lockeliddell.com>
       Attorney ::: Vice President, Extropy Institute ::: Wilderness Guide
          http://www.gregburch.net -or- http://members.aol.com/gburch1
                                            ICQ # 61112550
         "We never stop investigating. We are never satisfied that we know
         enough to get by. Every question we answer leads on to another
        question. This has become the greatest survival trick of our species."
                                           -- Desmond Morris >>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 10:00:02 MDT