Ross Andrew Finlayson writes,
> About the simulation concept, if we're in a simulation, we're all in it,
> were the dinosaurs millions of years ago, the simulation has been
> since the start of time, and it's better known as reality.
We're not in a simulation. I know... how boring.
Notice, however, the last sentence in The Economist article:
"Let us hope it does not develop any personality disorders."
Do you think considering itself to be in a simulation might qualify as a
The convergence of info-technology, bio-technology, and nano-technology
(referenced in the article pointed to in Max's recent post), promises to
make friendly robots a reality before SI, by all reasonable guesses. Ergo,
evolutionary phase transition will make Darwin more comfortable among the
machines than among the humans. By that I mean machines will evolve more
quickly than humans. So, expecting to take part in the phase transition
may constitute a personality disorder as far as autonomous robots are
concerned. I'm not trying to be negative here, just pointing out this
Useless hypotheses: consciousness, phlogiston, philosophy, vitalism, mind,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:59:41 MDT