RE: More Green Party (was SOC: Radical Anti-Genengineering)

From: Joseph 1 (
Date: Wed Jun 28 2000 - 06:34:10 MDT

Hash: SHA1

zeb haradon wrote on Wednesday, June 28, 2000 2:13 AM:

> People who are in favor
> of GPUSA (green party usa) type policies - I make this as a
> statistical and not absolute claim - would not have the
> intelligence or psychological drive to expand into a frontier.
> This is what would make it safe there.

I wouldn't agree with the intelligence assessment-- some of the
Luddites are actually quite smart in their field (heck, even Kazinski
was a math professor, and apparently a genius). But I would
definitely agree about the psychological factor; how could they get
along without the feel of the loam beneath their birkenstocks, or the
sweet warble of the spotted owl? (Unless, of course, they took a
"Silent Running" approach.)

> antarctica, as well as on floating antarctic ice bergs, which seems
> pretty cool I think,


> but would be very dangerous (I'm scared to live in CA because
> of the earth quakes).

Heheh... you don't have to go to California for quakes (Arkansas had
a 3.9 and Illinois a 2.9 just yesterday). Just check out to see where
the tremblers have hit in just the last day or so.

Joseph 1

Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <>


This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:14:40 MDT