Re: New X-humanist forums (regarding Natasha)

From: Carl Bonzer (
Date: Sun Jun 25 2000 - 20:16:55 MDT

>From: "Michael S. Lorrey" <>
>Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2000 21:44:57 -0400
>"R. Harrill" wrote:
> >
> > wrote about a wearying word-fight:
> >
> > > For my own perverse needs, I am seeing if any of the members of this
> > > conform to my idea of the accusation in question.
> >
> > OK, this perplexed bystander has a comment. Why was Brian subjected
> > to a rather snotty remark from somebody who said something along the
> > lines of "You, sir, have insulted the love of my life and I won't
> > stand for it!"?
> >
> > Seems to me that if a female stands up and slings mud then she, the
> > same as you, me, or anyone else, runs the risk of getting whacked.
> > For other persons to then say, "Now you apologize to the little
> > lady," exhibits rather crude sexism in my view.
>Good for you. Some of us feel that for a husband to NOT stand up for his
>wife is a sign of worse personal defects than mere sexism. And for the
>record, it was Brian who made the original, rather insulting aspersions
>as to Natashas personal life.

Lorrey, you dumb ass! This has been corrected repeatedly.

Jesus. Check the frickin facts.

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:14:31 MDT