RE: Extropian principles, let's have a look

From: Don Klemencic (klemencc@sgi.net)
Date: Sun Jun 11 2000 - 12:59:03 MDT


As I've been reading this discussion of the first Extropian Principle the
word that came to mind was 'discovery'. I did a word-search of the
principles and didn't find it used anywhere.

                                                                        Don Klemencic

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-extropians@extropy.com [mailto:owner-extropians@extropy.com] On
Behalf Of Max More
Sent: Friday, June 09, 2000 2:10 PM
To: Anders Sandberg
Cc: extropians@extropy.org
Subject: Re: Extropian principles, let's have a look

At 09:51 AM 6/9/00, Anders wrote:
>Max More <max@maxmore.com> writes:
>
>When I discuss transhumanism in Swedish, I tend to use the word
>"utveckling" (literally translated it becomes "out-unfolding"), which
>has the meaning of development, evolution, progress, growth,
>generation etc. (you can see that Swedish lacks the synonyms of
>English :-). The nice thing is that it conjures up an image of not a
>linear progression, but rather something unfolding and developing into
>many directions at once.

Anders: If you check earlier versions of the Principles, you'll see that
instead of Perpetual Progress I used to have "Boundless Expansion". A
number of people didn't like that, thinking that it gaving the impression
that we wanted to "pave over the universe". "Expansion" or "unfolding"
(thought the latter I don't like as much) *does* more clearly convey
multiple paths, or diverse *ways* of making progress. But then how to avoid
the "paving over" (and perhaps imperialist) connotations of "expansion"?

Suggestions welcome!

Max

Max More, Ph.D.
President, Extropy Institute. www.extropy.org
CEO, MoreLogic Solutions. www.maxmore.com
max@maxmore.com or more@extropy.org



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:13:07 MDT