Michael S. Lorrey writes:
> Ah, but is it unadvertised? I'll bet there are clauses in the user agreement that
> specifically grant RealNetworks the right to do this. If its not, I'd rather see a
> class action than legislation. Laws should be passed only when civil litigation fails
> to redress a wrong.
They're thinking about including the rights to the user's firstborn in
the fine print, in their next player version. Since the luser chose
not to read it, it's gotta be legal, right?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:12:12 MDT