A "John Clark" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote on Saturday, May 06, 2000 1:29
> >You believe that the copy and the original are the same person.
> Also true and apparently you do too because you say in you post " I see no
> no reason why the copy or the original should act or be treated
Two PC's running the same program should act and be treated the same. That
does not mean that they are the same PC. I cannot destroy one and claim
that I committed no property damage.
You seem to repeatedly blur the concept of "similar" to "identical" to
"same" to "one."
-- Harvey Newstrom <http://HarveyNewstrom.com> IBM Certified Senior Security Consultant, Legal Hacker, Engineer, Research Scientist, Author.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:10:34 MDT