Upon rereading your post of the 5th, you're right. That was an unfair
characterization of your actual words, which just said things like
"important", "probably right", "crucial" and such. I extrapolated from
my memory of this further than I should have, and I apologize.
I suppose much of my reaction to that particular post may have been
that you also described the book as "supported" (whatever that means)
by both Clinton and Gingrich, as if that were something positive. It
took considerable effort on my part to not immediately dismiss it on
those grounds alone, but I did manage to overcome my revulsion and
spend some time reading the web site so I could dismiss it with a
clearer conscience.
-- Lee Daniel Crocker <lee@piclab.com> <http://www.piclab.com/lcrocker.html>