Re: GUNS: Misrepresentation of previous messages

From: Joe Dees (
Date: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 11:50:57 MST

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) >Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:41:27 -0500
>From: Michael Lorrey <>
>Subject: Re: GUNS: Misrepresentation of previous messages
>Harvey Newstrom wrote:
>> At 10:52am -0800 2/23/01, Brian D Williams wrote:
>> >Really? Lets look at the exact post:
>> >
>> > >>Now, I wouldn't have minded much if they had duelled, tho I
>> >>>'spect that Gore woulda demanded three people as seconds, bragged
>> >>>that he invented duelling and thus gets to decide the rules AFTER
>> >>>having walked ten paces, denied the referee had any controlling
>> >>>and legal authority, Tipper would have demanded that videos of
>> >>>the duel carry warning labels, Gore would have denied ever having
>> >>>smoked a barrel ('cept maybe once), and the press would have
>> > >>declared Gore the winner before a shot was fired.
>> >
>> >Text search your heart out, as everyone can clearly see Mike made
>> >no mention of guns, although there is connotative reference to one.
>> Get real! Mike's post clearly introduces guns, even if he didn't use
>> the g-word. It is unreasonable to blame Joe's response for starting
>> this gun thread. You are clearly trying to publicly blame Joe for
>> something he didn't do. Please stop it.
>You stop it Harvey, stop lying like joe does, and stop claiming that I
>introduced the subject, since I didn't introduce the subject of duelling
I've already shown in a previous post that Mikey-boy lied when he called me a liar, so he possesses zero credibility concerning any of his subsequent slanders.

Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL! compares book price at 41 online stores.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:47 MDT