Re: GUNS: Misrepresentation of previous messages

From: Joe Dees (
Date: Sat Feb 24 2001 - 11:52:58 MST

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) >Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:21:48 -0500
>From: Michael Lorrey <>
>Subject: Re: GUNS: Misrepresentation of previous messages
>Brian D Williams wrote:
>> From: Harvey Newstrom <>
>> >You said you wanted to call attention to this post, so you got it.
>> >In reviewing the actual posting from Joe Dees, I find that you
>> >have misrepresented the history. Mike Lorrey actually introduced
>> >the topic of guns. Joe Dees was responding to Mike's earlier
>> >message.
>> Really? Lets look at the exact post:
>> >>Now, I wouldn't have minded much if they had duelled, tho I
>> >>'spect that Gore woulda demanded three people as seconds, bragged
>> >>that he invented duelling and thus gets to decide the rules AFTER
>> >>having walked ten paces, denied the referee had any controlling
>> >>and legal authority, Tipper would have demanded that videos of
>> >>the duel carry warning labels, Gore would have denied ever having
>> >>smoked a barrel ('cept maybe once), and the press would have
>> >>declared Gore the winner before a shot was fired.
>> >And George W. would have demanded the guns his father bought, and
>> >then not shown up for the duel, and insisted that he had (kinda
>> >like the national guard). And we all know who's snort snot would
>> >be found on the barrels.
>> Text search your heart out, as everyone can clearly see Mike made
>> no mention of guns, although there is connotative reference to one.
>And I was not the one who brought up the subject of duelling either, I
>was responding to an earlier poster on that, so once again, not only is
>Joe Wrong, but so is Harvey.
And whose post might THAT one be, ayy, Mikey? One of your droogies?

Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL! compares book price at 41 online stores.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:47 MDT