I would not endorse a blanket claim that distributed control generally works
more efficiently than centralized control, because different subjects submit
to different types of control differently. I don't think central control of
an *economy* increases aggregate wealth more than distributed control, but I
do rather like central control of my nervous system. Secondarily, and less
crucially, "efficient" remains a somewhat vague standard. Political leaders
often regard centralized control of economies as better than decentralized
control, and for good reason: it lines their pockets more efficiently.
I think it sufficient that we *appreciate* the benefits of spontaneous
ordering via decentralized control. I do not think we ought to endorse it as
a universal cure-all.
>In a message dated 1/25/01 6:08:30 PM Central Standard Time,
> In a spirit of non-confrontational rationalism, I'd like to see if we
> can compose a list of ideas that we *ALL* agree on.
> If you disagree with any of these memes, could you wave a hand and
> explain why?
>> 5. Central control is usually less efficient than distributed control.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:25 MDT