From: Steve Davies (Steve365@btinternet.com)
Date: Tue Sep 09 2003 - 08:13:08 MDT
> > Anders Sandberg <asa@nada.kth.se> said:
> > > Apropos some of our earlier discussions, here is a good essay by David
> > > Brin. Replace "libertarian" with "transhumanist" and you get a
powerful
> > > exhortation:
> > >
> > > http://www.techcentralstation.com/102802A.html
> > >
> > > (long version at http://www.davidbrin.com/libertarianarticle1.html)
> >
> > Brin write:
> >
> > "The fundamental premise of classical liberalism is an assumption that
> > people are basically rational and wise.
> >
> >
Samantha's response
> Actually, original "liberalism" is built on the assumption that you can so
> limit the legalized power of others over yourself as to not need to worry
> overly much about how rational or wise others are.
>
Well yes but is my response, I'm closer to Anders and Brin on this. The
above is a true, succinct statement of the political essense of classical
liberalism but I think that political argument assumes the rationality of
the majority. If the majority are not rational then the political project of
limiting the legalised power of others over oneself would not be
practicable. The sensible strategy would be to pursue power so as to protect
yourself. I think one of the two fundamental questions that divide people in
modern times is "Can you trust people to decide things for themselves?"
Classical liberals would say yes because people are broadly rational, learn
from mistakes, have access to knowledge that others do not (such as knowing
what they most value) while others would either say no you can't trust
people because they are ignorant/emotional/culture bound/gene driven or
whatever or that there is some revealed good way of living that should trump
people's subjective choices. The hidden premiss of the latter argument is
that there is an elite (the expert professionals in Brin's analysis) who
know better than the rest of us what's good for us. I'm reminded of what
Gladstone said when asked to define liberalism "Trust the people". (The full
version was "Liberalism is trust in the people tempered by prudence, Toryism
is mistrust of the people tempered by fear")
Steve Davies
> > But I do not think people in all cultures operate wisely and rationally.
> > Cultures endorse behavior, and some cultures are not very rational.
> > Therfore, some cultures do not operate very well at all. For example, I
do
> > not think there are any rational cultures in Africa, as far as I can
tell.
>
> Classical liberalism is not concerned with "cultures" or any other
collective.
> It is concerned with individuals and keeping them free to follow their own
> designs.
>
> - samantha
Couldn't agree more. There's a lot of sloppy thinking going on about
'cultures' these days, often with the unspoken assumption that culture is
destiny.
SD
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 09 2003 - 08:25:20 MDT