Re: SPACE: Reference for Mars Mission Costs

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Mon Sep 08 2003 - 11:33:34 MDT

  • Next message: Olga Bourlin: "Re: just getting started"

    Jay,

    Re:
    > Can anyone provide a reference for the estimated cost of
    > NASA's Mars Reference Mission?

    It isn't clear to me what report you are referencing (in the
    future it might be nice to post a URL)...

    But Zubrin, in Chapter 3 on pgs 46/47 of "The Case for Mars"
    documents the "90-Day Study on Human Exploration of the Moon and
    Mars", otherwise known as "The 90-Day Report".

    He says, "The 90-Day Report did not include a published cost
    estimate; however cost estimates for the program were generated
    that were eventually leaked to the press. The bottom line:
    $450 Billion."

    How accurate this is, I don't know. You might want to check
    the references. The numbers I've seen thrown around for something
    more simple tend to be in the range of $50-$100 Billion.

    But it seems to me that if a Mars robotic explorer mission costs
    ~$500 million that one could fund a heck of a lot of AI research
    for the difference between 10 Robotic/AI missions to Mars ($5B)
    and the cost of sending a few humans there. We just simply weren't
    designed for space -- so one either needs redesigned humans
    (comfortable in zero G, radiation tolerant, able to withstand
    long periods of colder temperatures for reduced metabolic
    requirements, perhaps smaller as Spike has argued) -- or one
    needs to forget the idea of Mars colonization/terraforming
    entirely. Instead go with migrating O'Neill colonies that
    can swing by Earth and pick up their passengers.

    Robert



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 08 2003 - 11:43:08 MDT