From: Randall Randall (randall@randallsquared.com)
Date: Thu Sep 04 2003 - 07:21:37 MDT
On Thursday, September 4, 2003, at 08:41 AM, BillK wrote:
> But if everything can be 'tagged' then surely this means that theft
> becomes impossible? It would need a central database to record changes
> of ownership of course, with the previous owner required to authorize
> the transfer. But if the authorities want to do suspect tracking then
> they will
> need to build the central database anyway.
It's currently a simple matter to disable these RFIDs, and I
would expect that the knowledge of how to do so would become
quite widespread if the RFIDs themselves were being used in
this way.
> Police would just need to visit your home and the scanner computer
> would
> list everything on the premises that was not registered to you. In
> future they might be able to do this without even physically entering
> the premises.
So thieves would have a faraday cage in the closet.
> So we can look forward to a near future without casual theft, burglary,
> mugging, car theft, etc.
Probably not.
> That should help to empty the prisons as well.
>
> Oh joyous day!
I'm not sure if you're joking or not. At least in the US, those
imprisoned for theft are a small percentage of the total. Per
http://www.aic.gov.au/media/20000821.html , the same is true for
Australia.
Ending the "War on Drugs" would have a far larger impact on prison
population.
-- Randall Randall <randall@randallsquared.com> "You assist an evail system most effectively by obeying its orders and decrees." -- Mahatma Gandhi
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Sep 04 2003 - 07:30:57 MDT