From: Extropian Agroforestry Ventures Inc. (megao@sasktel.net)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 11:58:17 MDT
How in a precise physical sense does it do this?
Is there a particular way it might route messages of varied degrees of
interest so that a copy can be made. If there is say an extra hop in the
transfer and a que as it records and sends along the data. If it needs a
particular path to process/glean then the most efficient routing would be
reduced to a bottleneck. There is a definite difference in time lags say from
a send to self within my own ISP and this list.
Given the enormous amount of data packets and the adgenda of TIA et al to be
thorough there is bound to be detectable evidence of traffic slowdown to
enable processing?
Chuck Kuecker wrote:
> I think you will find Carnivore does not "delay" messages - it "sniffs"
> them off the network and processes them at its own speed. It's more of a
> tap in the line, or at worst delays all packets equally. The idea was to
> read people's traffic - not censor it.
>
> That comes later.
>
> Chuck Kuecker
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-extropians@extropy.org [mailto:owner-extropians@extropy.org]
> >On Behalf Of Extropian Agroforestry Ventures Inc.
> >
> >
> >
> >I have some super hot jalapeno goodies lined up for the puppie but don't
> >have time to cook the meal till today or tomorrow lunchtime.
> >
> >The poor recipients kennel might not know what to make of it and I'll
> >have to delay a message to explain the dog's piping hot breakfast. One
> >dish will be delivered to the "Can - Ab- bis" puffing puppies. One to a
> >homeless puppy...
> >
> >A very bad cook
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 01 2003 - 13:10:47 MDT