Re: Carnivore processing cause of email reciept delay?

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Mon Sep 01 2003 - 03:21:51 MDT

  • Next message: Alex Ramonsky: "Re: scientific american issue on human augmentation"

    I would tend to agree with Anders -- it should not be too difficult to
    setup some controlled experiments. Across the U.S., across Canada,
    across Australia, perhaps some equivalent distance points in Europe.

    If it really were true that "hot" messages get delayed (and one ought
    to test different types of "hot" messages), it would be something that
    could be submitted to /. and would probably end up in the NY Times.

    In part because carnivore/DCS1000 is only *supposed* to be used to
    track email from "suspected" individuals. I have a really hard time
    believing, given the mind-set of many individuals who work for ISPs,
    that if this were being done that it could remain secret for long.

    I also note that the article dates are 2001 and a lot has happened
    since then -- some of which we may be unaware of due to the Patriot
    Act(s).

    Robert

    On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Anders Sandberg wrote:

    > Actually demonstrating this would likely make waves, which would be
    > good. Could you describe the experiment in more detail?



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Sep 01 2003 - 03:32:59 MDT