Re: Astrobiology

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Tue Aug 26 2003 - 09:56:43 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: g**gle is also a calculator"

    On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Anders Sandberg wrote:

    > I think it is an important paper anyway, since it acts to make the
    > astrobiology community more awareness of the postbiological
    > possibilities. As Robert has pointed out, that is a very hard sell
    > right now.

    I think it may be important to note that Steven Dick has expertise
    focused in the historic aspects of SETI research. So I would not
    expect to see much in the way of novel proposals. The interesting
    part of the paper is to see transhumanist ideas, e.g. citations of
    Brin, Moravec, Kurzweil, etc. slowly creeping into SETI thinking.

    He doesn't point out the work by Lineweaver regarding the probability
    that most "Earths" are older than ours or consider the relationship
    to transhumanism, but past and forthcoming work by Cirkovic and some
    of the work by Bostrom has/will deal with those oversights.

    The value of the paper is that it is getting to goals 5, 6 & 7 of
    the astrobiology roadmap [1] which is of high interest to most
    extropians. (Interestingly, Steven Dick is, I believe, partially
    responsible for defining the roadmap -- so he has some throw weight
    within the community.)

    Robert

    1. http://astrobiology.arc.nasa.gov/roadmap/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 26 2003 - 10:05:52 MDT