Re: Considering standard of living (was Re: Land of let's only talk about whats wrong with the US)

From: bill@wkidston.freeserve.co.uk
Date: Sun Aug 24 2003 - 07:54:44 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "The Extropian Menu Challenge [was: Land of let's only talk about whats wrong with the US]"

    http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/?030818ta_talk_surowiecki

    Ref: The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going
    Broke by Elizabeth Warren, et al
    Release Date: September 2, 2003

    The New Yorker has an interesting article about a new book which claims
    that the cost of having kids is ruining the middle-class.
    Another reason for the dropping birthrate?
    The article also points out that having fewer children will mean big
    financial problems in the future.

    Also in the Financial Times (UK)
    http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059479217608&p=1037535656670¶

    Quote:
    You might, then, expect American families to be luxuriating in good
    fortune. But, compared with people who don’t have children, people who
    do are in worse economic shape than they’ve ever been in. The Harvard
    law professor Elizabeth Warren and her daughter Amelia Warren Tyagi
    demonstrate, in their forthcoming book “The Two-Income Trap,” that
    having a child is now the best indicator of whether someone will end up
    in “financial collapse.” Married couples with children are twice as
    likely as childless couples to file for bankruptcy. They’re seventy-five
    per cent more likely to be late paying their bills. And they’re also far
    more likely to face foreclosure on their homes. Most of these people are
    not, by the usual standards, poor. They’re middle-class couples who are
    in deep financial trouble in large part because they have kids.

    In the past two decades or so, the cost of having children has risen
    much faster than the cost of being childless. Conventional wisdom aside,
    this has little to do with spoiled kids, acquisitive parents, or
    PlayStation 2. Instead, it’s the result of two things: housing and
    education. According to the Federal Reserve Board, between 1983 and 1998
    the price of housing for married couples with children rose seventy-nine
    per cent in real terms, roughly three times as much as it did for
    childless people. One reason is that houses are bigger now. But,
    according to Warren and Tyagi, the real reason is that parents get into
    bidding wars for homes in safe neighborhoods with good public schools.

    Then, there’s college. Thirty years ago, middle-class parents could feel
    they’d done a good job of raising a child if he or she made it through
    high school—decent jobs for unskilled and semi-skilled labor were
    readily available. Today, such jobs are much harder to find, and college
    is considered a necessity. Needless to say, it is also extremely expensive.

    The United States has $6.7 trillion in debt and forty trillion in
    potential obligations to the elderly or soon-to-be-elderly, and we’re
    sticking future workers with the bill. Even if the American birth rate
    stays where it is, we’re headed for serious trouble. If it drops, look out.

    End quotes.

    Food for thought?

    BillK



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 24 2003 - 08:09:01 MDT