From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Thu Aug 21 2003 - 09:11:35 MDT
At 08:57 PM 8/20/03 -0700, you wrote:
>On Wed, 20 Aug 2003, randy wrote:
>
> > Some Japanese scientists want a 30 yr program to develop a robot with
> > the capabilities of a 5 yr old. Slashdot discussion link below
> > includes link to article.
> >
> >
> http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/20/2051215&mode=thread&tid=126&tid=134@ Imp
>
>You mean 30 years for the Japanese to put a robot in the Whitehouse?
>
>But seriously, 5 year old human equivalency in what? Go through it feature
>by feature, ie do a profile of human vs. robot. Robots far surpass humans
>now in some ways. Do the Japanese want to dumb down the machines to a 5
>year level? No. So exactly how do they want to increase the level of the
>robot in that profile?
The Atom Project would be a humanoid robot with the physical, intellectual
and emotional capacity of a 5-year-old. It would have decision making
attributes and self-induced motor activity.
I'm glad that they are choosing a 5 year old rather than a 2 year old. A 5
year old has outgrown the terrible 2 stage of perturbation and erratic
exploration, and spends his time learning and thinking in developing
character. 5 year old want to identify with adults and are like little men
and women. While any age has its ups and downs, I think it is an excellent
age for the Atom Project.
I'm curious what standards and methods - whose/what AI designs - they will
try to implement in developing intelligence/emotion.
Natasha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 21 2003 - 07:22:49 MDT