From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 18:54:24 MDT
In a message dated 8/19/2003 3:44:54 PM Central Standard Time,
natashavita@earthlink.net writes: "Many people left the list prior because they felt that
sickened by what you and others have written. This is precisely why we are
trying to find a resolve and deal with the problems."
###Isn't that an interesting comment? More personal attacks were made
on Mike Lorry after his departure than he ever made while he was on line. He
was non PC and he debated ideas but any personal comments were few and mild.
But in listening to the group I get the idea that Mike's sole offense was
that he did not agree with you, not that he was personally insulting. I get the
idea that you can't distinguish between the two.
You quoted me, "So why am I replying? Because I consider it
despicable to continue attacking Mike in his absence. As he isn't here to defend
himself I have spoken on his behalf."
And you replied, "What attacks against Mike?"
Natasha, that goes beyond reason. If you don't know then please read
the list that you and those close to you are purported to own. If you have
read those attacks and are that biased, then there simply is nothing I can say.
But please don't ask me to accept that as an informed and unbiased opinion.
Ron h.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 19 2003 - 19:03:42 MDT