RE: Alternative strategies

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rafal@smigrodzki.org)
Date: Fri Aug 15 2003 - 02:26:28 MDT

  • Next message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: WAR: Alternative strategies"

    Robert wrote:
    > Looks like the weapons strategies for "war" are about to
    > become more complex.
    >
    > See:
    >
    > Gamma-ray weapons could trigger next arms race
    > David Hambling, 13 August 2003
    > NewScientist.com
    > http://www.newscientist.com/news/print.jsp?id=ns99994049
    >
    > My understanding of such technology is that it would allow
    > the relatively painless termination of human lives (vs.
    > nuclear weapons where the heat produced is likely to produce
    > burn victims). Rafal, Aubrey or anyone else should correct
    > my impressions if you believe they are incorrect.

    ### Well, death from radiation can indeed be relatively painless, as in the
    case of nuclear reactor worker who received about 10 000 rem of radiation in
    a minute or so, quickly became confused, then unconscious and died in a few
    hours.

    The devices described above, however, would release gamma rays in a
    non-directional way, meaning all persons within a radius would be exposed,
    and the dose would vary from very high in a few to merely lethal in the
    rest. Merely lethal means the same general pattern of radiation sickness we
    know from exposure to fallout: radiation burns, intestinal lining loss,
    diarrhea, vomiting, hair loss, immunosuppression, cachexia, cancer and
    leukemia. A bad death.

    Interesting to imagine the suicide marksman of August 1st 2066, who in
    imitation of Charles Whitman Jr., climbs a tower somewhere in the US, armed
    with 700 rounds of 50kg TNT-equivalent bullets.

    On the other hand, the Homeland SWAT brigade will be by then armed with the
    low-orbit-to-surface hypervelocity kinetic kill weapon, which should get
    him within a few minutes (picture a lance of superhot tungsten descending
    from the sky to smite enemies of the state...), and the 3rd generation
    airborne laser, which might vaporize him within a few seconds of target
    acquisition.

    This will be an interesting millennium.

    If there is any research worth putting on the back-burner, production of
    nuclear isomers looks like a good candidate.

    Rafal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 14 2003 - 23:44:29 MDT