From: matus (matus@matus1976.com)
Date: Thu Aug 14 2003 - 09:19:53 MDT
> Criticized would be
> > a better word and we've both done it, hell you criticized
> me in your
> > last post but that's OK, I'll survive. I note that one person you
> > didn't criticize was Tim May last February, in fact you
> jumped on me
> > when I said May had lost his mind when he advocated
> terrorist destroy
> > Washington DC so a lot of black people could be gotten rid of.
> > Apparently pushing for genocide is forgivable but calling
> somebody a
> > doo doo head is not. Odd rule for a list that is Extropian.
> >
>
> Do you really consider this highly biased recollection to be
> an accurate
> portrayal of the validity of my claim? If so then I think
> you have done
> little for your credibility.
>
> - samantha
>
Samantha, the same of course could be said of you. Do you really
consider *your* highly biased recollection to be an accurate portrayal
of the validity of *your* claim? Obviously the person to best comment
on such a history would be someone with little interest in either side.
If anyone would be more likely to be biased, it would be those directly
involved. I hardly think anyone here is an ultimate pervayeor of
absolute truth while everyone else is a raving biased lunatic.
Michael Dickey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 14 2003 - 09:29:04 MDT