Re: Arnold will run!

From: Steve Davies (Steve365@btinternet.com)
Date: Thu Aug 07 2003 - 11:09:58 MDT

  • Next message: Randall Randall: "Re: Arnold will run!"

    >
    >On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 10:23 AM, John K Clark wrote:
    >
    >>> "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the
    >>> United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution,
    >>> shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any
    >>> person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained
    >>> to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a
    >>> resident within the United States."
    >>
    >> Brett Paatsch" <bpaatsch@bigpond.net.au>
    >>
    >>> So on my reading, (and contrary to what I thought I knew),
    >>> if Arnie is a US citizen and has been a resident for 14 years
    >>> he is not precluded.
    >>
    >> Huh? It says nobody born outside the USA can become president unless
    >> he was
    >> naturalized when the constitution was adopted, is older than 35, and
    >> lived
    >> in the USA for at least 14 years. Arnold was not born in the USA, so
    >> unless
    >> he's about 200 years old and was naturalized when the constitution was
    >> adopted he can't be president.
    >
    >If they meant "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of
    >the
    >United States at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall
    >be",
    >why didn't they say that? Basically, Brett is saying that it might be a
    >valid rewording to say:
    >When this Constiution is adopted, no person except a natural born
    >citizen
    >or a citizen of the United States shall be eligible to the office of
    >President [...]
    >
    >In an otherwise admirably terse document, why add a comma in the middle
    >of
    >a phrase, if not to clarify that two phrases are intended? :)
    >
    >--
    >Randall Randall <randall@randallsquared.com>
    >"Not only can money buy happiness,
    > it isn't even particularly expensive any more." -- Spike Jones

    I can see how this is ambiguous, given the comma after "United States".
    (Notice the distinction between "natural born citizen" - of one of the
    States presumably - and "citizen of the United States"). Has this ever been
    tested? I'm thinking we could palm T. Blair off onto you.

    Steve Davies



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 11:22:28 MDT