Separated Photons (was Fermi "Paradox")

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Thu Aug 07 2003 - 01:48:41 MDT

  • Next message: Lee Corbin: "RE: How transparent should transparency be?"

    Damien writes

    > At 11:35 PM 8/6/03 -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
    >
    > >Can it be determined, at detector number two, whether
    > >the wave function has already--presumably at detector
    > >number one--been "collapsed", whether the photons have
    > >already been "disentangled"?
    >
    > The argument I made (borrowing from Tim Maudlin) in THE WHITE ABACUS is
    > that you can't even tell which one gets collapsed first, because in
    > relativity you can jiggle frames to argue either one happens before the other.
    >
    > But I am not a lawyer.

    But you are right. This resembles the EPR situation, and
    I have an essay that explains the MWI version of EPR.
    http://www.leecorbin.com/EPR_MWI.html

    Damien is exactly right. If the separation between two
    events P and Q is spacelike, (which only means that there
    is no way to send a photon from one event to the other),
    then if you are traveling with sufficient velocity towards
    the space coordinates of P, then in your reference frame
    P will happen first. Vice-versa for Q.

    Lee



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 01:59:25 MDT