Re: Dembski the what?

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Wed Aug 06 2003 - 11:09:08 MDT

  • Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: Max More Article -- Worth Reading!"

    Damien Broderick wrote:
    >
    >>Er, why is the term "Singularitarian" being used in connection with this
    >>conference on the supposed deterministic acceleration of technological
    >>change, a claim which is neither made by, nor relevant to, Singularitarians?
    >
    > That's a question to be taken up with John Smart, I should imagine, but I
    > don't think he's on this list any longer. Then again, maybe he doesn't use
    > the term `Singularitarian' anyway, although last time I talked to him the
    > Singularity prospect was his major concern.

    As far as I know, John has never called himself a Singularitarian. He
    also doesn't seem to use the term "Singularity" much anymore. I'd drop it
    myself if I could. Shame about the massively predictable catastrophe
    where everyone tries to kidnap the nice poetic word for their own wildly
    different usages, wish I'd seen it coming in advance.

    -- 
    Eliezer S. Yudkowsky                          http://singinst.org/
    Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Aug 06 2003 - 11:20:01 MDT