quantum deletion (was: Re: Fermi "Paradox")

From: Damien Broderick (damienb@unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Sun Aug 03 2003 - 20:01:17 MDT

Next message: Freematt357@aol.com: "Re: Are Extropians promoters of an ascetic ideal and alienation?"

Previous message: Lee Corbin: "Why Not Expand? (was Fermi "Paradox")"
In reply to: scerir: "Re: Fermi "Paradox""
Next in thread: scerir: "Re: quantum deletion (was: Re: Fermi "Paradox")"
Reply: scerir: "Re: quantum deletion (was: Re: Fermi "Paradox")"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 08:57 AM 8/3/03 +0200, Serafino wrote:

>Recently Hodorecki established the principle
>of conservation of quantum information. It
>means that no quantum information can be
>'cloned' (xoxed) but also that no quantum
>information can be 'deleted'.

So where *does* it get archived when stuff falls into a black hole? (Stuck
on an event horizon surface `membrane'?) Or does this support Lee Corbin's
conjecture that such holes have no physical reality?

Damien Broderick

Next message: Freematt357@aol.com: "Re: Are Extropians promoters of an ascetic ideal and alienation?"
Previous message: Lee Corbin: "Why Not Expand? (was Fermi "Paradox")"
In reply to: scerir: "Re: Fermi "Paradox""
Next in thread: scerir: "Re: quantum deletion (was: Re: Fermi "Paradox")"
Reply: scerir: "Re: quantum deletion (was: Re: Fermi "Paradox")"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 03 2003 - 20:12:20 MDT