RE: How transparent should transparency be?

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Sat Aug 02 2003 - 14:48:31 MDT

  • Next message: Party of Citizens: "RE: Genocide sucks"

    Rafal writes

    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "Lee Corbin" <lcorbin@tsoft.com>
    > ...
    > > If we are safe in our persons and property, then let's not
    > > care what is known about us.
    >
    > ### A resounding "yes" to every single one of your words, Lee. :-)

    Well, ironically enough, I had just decided to post a demur
    to one of my own points! Then I log on and see that you
    are agreeing with all my points :-( Maybe I'm just not
    comfortable ever agreeing with you, only in this case, it
    was achieved by telepathy.

    At

    http://www.corante.com/brainwaves/20030701.shtml#46081

    it says

        Cognitive liberty: the right of a person to liberty, autonomy and
        privacy over his or her own intellect is situated at the core of
        what it means to be a free person. This principle is what gives
        life to some of our most well-established and cherished human and
        constitutional rights. Today, as new drugs, technologies and
        techniques are being developed for augmenting, enhancing, or
        conversely, surveilling and controlling human thought, the CCLE
        produces original research and analysis, and engages in legal
        advocacy aimed at protecting cognitive liberty and the full
        potential of the human intellect.

    It was especially remiss of us as Extropians not to think of this
    angle!

    I will have to give it some thought as to whether the "complete
    openness" principle that I was speaking in favor of should be
    this inclusive. What do you think, (perhaps in a few years I
    need not ask!)

    Lee



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 02 2003 - 14:58:20 MDT