From: nanowave (nanowave@shaw.ca)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 16:26:33 MDT
Reason writes:
>Ok, now this is less useful too general, I think.
Hi reason and thanks for your feedback. I might have made an effort to
determine what the GKES header on this thread meant before posting, but
instead I simply 'winged-it' based on the remainder of the subject line.
>One can assume that we're all interested in grassroots transhumanism, for
example.
I might have been more specific there. I meant 'meatspace grassroots
transhumanism'. In other words, I am interested in
transhumanism-for-dummies-like memes and vectors specifically enabling the
general non to semi-technical population (or the 'proles' as spike might
say) in my immediate geographical region (i.e. my salon client base) to
favorably grasp, participate in, and profit from the project of
transhumanism.
>What, specifically, are you actually *doing* in the sense of organizing,
running,
>creating?
Pretty much that.
>I'd like to have some sort of lower-bound cut-off off on project
>effort/size on this list in order to keep it useful.
Surely you meant to type "this thread" not "this list". This list is for
the discussion of things relevant to transhumanists and transhumanism. If
just one other list member finds a part of what I write to be interesting or
relevant to transhumanism, then what I have written is *useful* by
definition. And up to eight times a day I might add.
Ward and ware the patellar reflex to institute "lower-bound cut-off's" with
regard to list content.
RE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 16:40:34 MDT