Re: Do Asians and Westerners Think Differently? -> Sapir-Whorf hypothesis ?

From: Giu1i0 Pri5c0 (gpmap@runbox.com)
Date: Sun Jul 27 2003 - 03:55:58 MDT

  • Next message: avatar: "disregard 2"

    I think it is a feedback loop, thought defines language and in turn language
    constrains thought, at least when you think with words. I don't think the
    effect is very strong when you compare similar languages. I spoke only one
    language (Italian) as a child, so most of the times I think in that
    language. I know some other languages (English Spanish and French, all
    indo-european languages) well enough to think in them when I am speaking
    them, and I do not notice any significant difference. But I am sure that if
    I could speak Chinese well enough to think in Chinese when speaking Chinese,
    I would notice significant differences in my thought patterns. At least this
    is what fluent speakers of two very different languages (e.g. a child whose
    two mother languages are English and Chinese) say.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Frederik Cheeseman" <mail@cheeseman.sh>
    To: <extropians@extropy.org>
    Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 11:22 AM
    Subject: Re: Do Asians and Westerners Think Differently? -> Sapir-Whorf
    hypothesis ?

    >
    > Just take a look at:
    >
    > http://www.loglan.org/what-is-loglan.html
    >
    > An excerpt of the above :
    >
    > ...
    > There is a linguistic theory--known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis--that
    the structure of a human language sets limits on the thinking of those who
    speak it; hence a language could even place constraints on the development
    of the cultures that use it.
    > ...
    >
    > Is this true ?
    >
    > ---------
    > Frederick H. Cheeseman
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jul 27 2003 - 04:07:05 MDT