Re: Radical Suggestions

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Fri Jul 25 2003 - 10:48:35 MDT

  • Next message: Joao Magalhaes: "Re: Greenpeace takes on nanotech, AI & robotics"

    In a message dated 7/25/2003 11:34:20 AM Central Standard Time, jonkc@att.net
    writes: As for the North Korea nuclear weapons situation, yes it is very
    serious, but I just don't see a military solution. For one thing it's too late,
    they already have the bomb, but even with just conventional weapons a new Korean
    war would be the biggest bloodbath since World War 2. It is estimated that
    North Korea has the ability to fire 10,000 heavy artillery shells into Seoul, a
    city of 10 million people, every 20 seconds.

    John,
           You said, "but I just don't see a military solution." May I rephrase
    that to say, "I just don't see a purely military solution."
           I don't know the cycle time on a piece of artillery. But it can't be
    much more that once every 30 seconds (expertise on that subject anyone??)
    That in turn implies that the North Koreans have about 15,000 artillery pieces
    within 20 to 30 miles of Seoul. As the DMZ is some distance north of Seoul
    those guns must be fairly densely packed. I realize my numbers are not totally
    accurate but surely we could locate and take out a large percentage of them
    before they fired. Then of course if we are under the threat of nuclear attack I
    suppose we could use tactical nukes.
           In the end all of the above gives me a tool to use in opening
    negotiations. North Korean can be told we have the means of eliminating you and your
    weapons without suffering undue hardship ourselves. Would you like to
    negotiate your continued survival? Or alternatively we could determine that we could
    do nothing and be defeated.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jul 25 2003 - 10:59:17 MDT