RE: Fermi "Paradox"

From: Robin Hanson (rhanson@gmu.edu)
Date: Thu Jul 24 2003 - 05:33:36 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "RE: Fermi "Paradox""

    At 12:40 PM 7/24/2003 +0930, Emlyn O'regan wrote:
    > > >nobody today has 20 kids although ... feasible to do so ...
    > >
    > > I agree that we don't, and it seems that you agree this is a temporary
    > > evolutionary aberration due slow adaptation of DNA coded behavior.
    >
    >Busting into the middle of other peoples' conversation...
    >
    >"a temporary evolutionary aberration due slow adaptation of DNA coded
    >behavior."
    >
    >Does anyone really think that our modern (last thousand years or so?)
    >behaviours are temporary aberations to which DNA will eventually catch up?
    >It seems clear to me that DNA for humans has done its dash. ...
    >Belief systems, ideologies, ideas, these are driving our world now I think.
    >Not some quirky little quarternary tape machine.

    The aberration is temporary because DNA will soon be replaced by other
    faster-changing forms of genes, including those you mention.

    Robin Hanson rhanson@gmu.edu http://hanson.gmu.edu
    Assistant Professor of Economics, George Mason University
    MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030-4444
    703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 05:43:07 MDT