Re: Cryonics and information theory

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 18:16:21 MDT

  • Next message: Mike Lorrey: "RE: Cutting Taxes to Spur the Economy"

    On Monday 07 July 2003 02:55, randy wrote:

    > >> I am still signed up for cryonics, but it seems to be to be a very low
    > >> probability chance of success, barely better than nothing. Many people
    > >> don't even bother to sign up for this reason. I certainly hope that
    > >> better methods can reduce this situation before my time comes.
    >
    > But how do they calculate the odds?

    The calculation need not be particularly rigorous. If significant information
    is stored structurally and if significant structural damage is a property of
    current cryonic techniques then it is given that there will likely be too
    much loss of significant information.

    >
    > Eliezer Yudkowsky wrote:
    > >I've spoken with Peter Passaro about this, and apparently the main things
    > >are (a) get frozen as soon as possible after death (b) use the new
    > >oxygenated cryoprotectants (c) keep the brain from being starved of
    > >oxygen. So people are working on it, and if you get frozen with the
    > >latest techniques your chance of survival may still be pretty good.
    > >
    > >One problem I have, though, is that it still looks to me like it would be
    > >better to just chop off the head and drop it into a bucket of liquid
    > >nitrogen as fast as possible. *Large*-scale freezing damage is
    > >irrelevant; you can still connect the dots easily enough.
    >

    No, I don't think you can. What are to use to "connect the dots" where which
    dots were connected to what and even some of the dots themselves is precisely
    what was lost to freezing damage?

    > >What you want
    > >to ensure is that the information, the Shannon information, is still
    > >there. I would not be surprised to find even the earliest cryonics
    > >patients are resurrectable in toto; it is not necessary that the cells be
    > >reparable but that their physical state, when scanned down to the atomic
    > >level, contain enough information to extrapolate back the original brain
    > >and its relevant high-level information.

    The power of the scan is irrelevant at the resuscitation end if what is
    scanned is too critically damaged in some of its major information bearing
    aspects.

    - samantha
      



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 18:27:00 MDT