Re: Solar sailing vs. laws of physics ?

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 21:03:12 MDT

  • Next message: Spike: "RE: Solar sailing vs. laws of physics ?"

    Damien Broderick wrote:
    > At 10:38 AM 7/3/03 -0700, Hal wrote:
    >
    >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306050
    >
    >> Is this the same Thomas Gold famous for his "deep earth gas"
    >> hypothesis?
    >
    > Yes, but more relevantly this is the same Tommy Gold who with Bondi,
    > Hoyle and others eludicated how the goddamn Sun burns in the first
    > place, invented the Steady State theory (too bad, good try though), and
    > was the first person to suggest in print that pulsars are spinning
    > neutron stars...

     From Slashdot:
    >
    > Re:I don't think so (Score:5, Informative) by RobertFisher (21116) on
    > Thursday July 03, @09:54AM (#6357969) (http://astron.berkeley.edu/~bobf
    > | Last Journal: Wednesday August 07, @12:09PM) I agree with your
    > analysis.
    >
    > In the way of background, note that Gold is the same Gold of the
    > Bondi-Holye-Gold steady state cosmological model, proposed in the 1940s
    > and 1950s as an attempt to "fix problems" with the big bang model, and
    > has long held non-conventional views on light. Gold and others invoked
    > "tired light" -- photons which became redder from their point of
    > emission, even though doing so contradicted momentum-energy
    > conservation. It's a archetypical example of a theory trashing a
    > fundamental principle in order to exaplain last week's cosmological
    > observations. We should always be wary of our assumptions, but all too
    > often, cosmological theorists will attempt to make a splash by
    > abandoning them in favor of explaining very tenuous and often incorrect
    > observations.
    >
    > Gold has always been an outsider in the astrophysics community, but has
    > done some very good work over the years; including some seminal work on
    > pulsars. He was Peter Goldreich's (major figure in theoretical
    > astrophysics, for those not familiar) Ph.D. advisor.
    >
    > Those interested in the history of the steady-state model, including
    > attempts to resurrect it, and the many errors it commits, can check out
    > this page [ucla.edu].

    This explains Gold's bizarre comments on the momentum of photons.

    -- 
    Eliezer S. Yudkowsky                          http://singinst.org/
    Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 03 2003 - 21:13:42 MDT