Re: META: Dishonest debate (was "cluster bombs")

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Thu Jun 12 2003 - 07:36:11 MDT

  • Next message: Amara Graps: "re: cluster bombs"

    In a message dated 6/12/2003 12:58:26 AM Central Standard Time,
    hal@finney.org writes: I would also suggest that Harvey should not be so quick to claim
    that another poster is dishonest. We should try to read each person's message
    charitably, in the most favorable possible light, and look for valid
    interpretations before leaping to accusations of dishonesty and the like. Calling
    someone dishonest is a serious charge, worse than saying they listen to those who
    hate America. Hal

    Hal,
           Thank you, someone should also have asked in the begining if that was
    the beginning of the discussion. To the best of my memory neither you nor
    Harvey have ever found the beginning. I believe Amara presented the news article
    as evidence she had found to support a discussion she and I had as much as a
    month or two ago.
           Last, while you two young lads were leaping so quickly to that ladies
    defense you might have noticed that she never complained about me
    misrepresenting her.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 12 2003 - 07:45:17 MDT