Re: FWD [forteana][ExT][Para-Discuss] Re: faster than light?

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Tue Jun 10 2003 - 03:30:39 MDT

  • Next message: Amara Graps: "astrophysics of dust"

    On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 04:16:17PM -0700, Terry W. Colvin wrote:
    > Applying propigation of forces math to gravity to determine its "speed"
    > seems very silly to me. I'd liken it to someone asking what is the
    > velocity of the distance between say London and Manchester!

    Yes and no. Fields don't move, but they change from point to point in
    spacetime and it is often interesting to know how a change at one point
    affects other points. Since that will happen within a future cone from
    the point, it makes sense to think of it having a velocity = the amount
    of space a disturbance reaches in a given time. Velocity does not make
    sense when thinking about a field where nothing new or special happens,
    but when it does it tells us something about the causal structure of the
    field in spacetime.

    In the gravity case things are of course trickier since spacetime is the
    field itself.

    -- 
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
    asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
    GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 10 2003 - 03:41:20 MDT