RE: Atheism as a spandrel? (was Re: Deep River/Deep Sleep etc)

From: Young Patrick (M83072) (Patrick.Young@sshawebmail.nhs.uk)
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 03:51:49 MDT

  • Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Atheism as a spandrel? (was Re: Deep River/Deep Sleep etc)"

    Pardon me for interjecting,
     
    The bench scientists are probably lurking, waiting in hope (& desperation)
    to unearth the occasional posts about science & technology amongst all the
    political ranting.
     
    The ideological stuff is rather off-putting & seems besides the point.
     
    Patrick
     
     
     
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Spudboy100@aol.com [mailto:Spudboy100@aol.com]
    Sent: 08 June 2003 06:18
    To: extropians@extropy.org
    Subject: Re: Atheism as a spandrel? (was Re: Deep River/Deep Sleep etc)
     
    Brett, what is disturbing to me is my sense of how few bench researchers
    have interest in Transhumanism or cryo, or uploading. Maybe its too new a
    concept for them. Or maybe we are all deluded and everything is hopeless, or
    maybe there are other answers. (No I am NOT making a stealth attempt to pimp
    religion here!).

    When I first climbed aboard the Extropian list, I was hoping to see some
    scientists promoting Transhumanism, some cosmologists or astronomers writing
    about new, wondrous, essays; such as Moravec or Tipler. Basically, it ain't
    happening and I am not sure why this is? But we seem to have a dearth of
    interested theorists. Harvey Newstrom had a similar question about this last
    week. I dunno. :-(

    Brett stated:
    <<I wonder then if Einstein would regard those who seek to avoid
    total personal annihilation not through religion or superstition but
    through the scientific pursuit of life extension, uploading, cryonics
    etc as feeble souls and ridiculous egoists?

    I don't think most transhumanists would think of themselves as
    "feeble souls" and "ridiculous egoists".

    I'm an atheist, but the psychology of believing is easier for me to
    explain than the psychology of disbelieving. I can see how believing
    and hoping for some sort of personal survival and continuance
    however irrationally, could be an evolutionary advantage enabling
    one to pass on one's genes, yet disbelieving in all forms of personal
    continuation seems to be self defeating mechanism more likely to
    instil depression and hopelessness.>>



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 09 2003 - 03:48:56 MDT