RE: `twisted ethics prevalent on the extropy board'

From: Brett Paatsch (paatschb@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Mon Jun 09 2003 - 01:00:56 MDT

  • Next message: John K Clark: "Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"

    matus@matus1976.com writes in response to Damien:

    > > But the general point seems to me this: there is a moral
    > > asymmetry between one's standpoint on
    > >
    > > (a) issues where one's democratic representatives and
    > > their affiliates are making decisions on one's behalf,
    > >
    > > and (not-a) choices made by people outside one's
    > > sphere of influence.
    > >
    > > If your deputy is acting in a way you regard as
    > > deplorable, it's up to you to speak out. If someone over
    > > in the next town or nation is doing so, you might take a
    > > keen interest, but you generally have a lesser moral
    > > responsibility to speak out.
    >
    > Absurd, this is the kind of twisted ethics prevalent on the
    > extropy board that alienates me.

    I am not on the extropian board. But this sort of assertion on
    a forum that exists because some people including those who
    *are* on the extropian board take the time and trouble to
    make it exist is grossly unfair.

    Please substantiate your comment in relation to *the board*
    or have the decency to retract it and apologise.

    - Brett Paatsch



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 09 2003 - 01:17:18 MDT