From: matus@matus1976.com
Date: Sun Jun 08 2003 - 23:38:02 MDT
> At 01:41 AM 6/8/03 -0400, matus@matus1976.com wrote:
>
> >Afraid you might alienate
> >members of this board who helped to bring about that enslavement[?]
> [...]
> >Absurd, this is the kind of twisted ethics prevalent on the extropy board
> >that alienates me.
> [...]
> >Yet again I find myself
> >feeling deep visceral disgust to an extropian's concept of ethics.
>
> Personal clarification:
>
> I am not an extropian.
Then what are you doing here?
> I am not, therefore, on Extropy's board, but I certainly don't find the
> ethics of those who are `twisted'. If I did, I'd get my cut-price drinks
> elsewhere.
>
Must one be on Extropy's board to call themselves an extropian? If that is
the case, perhaps the extropian board should define some of thier ethical
principles. Or is an extropian different to each person, but having a
definition tending to share such common values as using technology to better
human lives (at least their own life)
> If you feel `deep visceral disgust to an extropian's concept of ethics',
> what are you doing here? (Just wondering.)
>
I was referring to your ethics and previously to Emlyn's ethics, or at least
the statement you have made that hinted toward your ethical principles. I
have not found these particular ethical concepts of 'it is more immoral the
more it effects me' and 'removing a murderous tyrant is morally as bad as
being a murderous tyrant' prevelant on this board, however I have found
seemingly questionable ethical principles more prevalent than reasonable
ones. I may be mistaken, and would invite extropians to present their
ethical foundations.
Many of the members I have conversed with off list and on actually seem to
acknowledge that murderous oppresive regimes are bad, and indeed more bad
than 'regimes' that imprison members of its population in relatively
comfortable prisons for victimless actions, such as smoking pot.
However, some do not, some suggest that the good guys won in vietnam (much
to of the dismay of the millions of enslaved and murdered indochinese
people) Some actively supported the abandonment of said persons, and still
feel such abandonment as just, some others suggest the US is immorral for
killing Iraqi civilians in a war to remove a murderous dictator, but scoff
at the immorrality of leaving impoverished and enslaved people to suffer and
die, more of the 'if it doesnt bother me, its not immorral' system of ethics
you seem to endorse.
However, I point out, you did not specify your moral position on such a
question, as I previously asked you and you did not include an answer in
your response. I shall ask again
Damien said:
> When I hear that Saddam and his sons and regime tortured and murdered
> people, I am horrified; when I hear that US jails contain a
> million or more
> prisoners many of them incarcerated for using marijuana and subjected in
> prison to rampant rape and brutality, I am horrified as well.
...but are you equally horrified? !!!!!!!!
Are you seriously suggesting it is equally deplorable that humans beings are
being raped, murdered, and tortured as you find human beings spending a few
months in climate controlled prison watching survivor, weight lifting and
reading Playboy in a post industrialized west nation living longer healther
better lives than perhaps 3/4's of the world?
So, which is it, is it more wrong to rape and murder someone (albiet,
someone you dont know) or more wrong to toss a pot smoking youth in jail?
Accordingly, which are you morally required to voice objections to? The one
you have more control over, or the one that is more wrong (if, indeed, you
feel one is actually more wrong than the other)
Further, is Saddam Hussain morally culpable for the deaths of the civilians
in the Coalition lead effort to remove said murderous tyrant from power, or
is the coalition morally culpable?
Regards,
Michael Dickey
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 08 2003 - 23:32:55 MDT