RE: META: Hal Finney, Interim List Moderator

From: Hal Finney (hal@finney.org)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 23:17:48 MDT

  • Next message: Emlyn O'regan: "RE: Getting off the dime"

    Sorry to be slow responding to this - I did some travelling over the
    weekend and then was busy at work through today.

    Lee Corbin had written:

    > Question: Are you suggesting or do you suggest
    > that no one ever issue the accusation "You are
    > engaging in X", where X is against the list rules?
    >
    > Question: Are you saying that if someone believes
    > he or she has been attacked, then it would be
    > against the list rules to respond?

    No, I don't think either of these is true.

    If you can engage in a response when you have been attacked without
    resorting to personal attacks yourself, that's fine. It takes
    considerable self control so I don't think many people can accomplish it,
    but if you can ignore the insults and just respond calmly on the issues,
    more power to you.

    In my opinion it is more questionable to accuse someone of violating the
    list rules (a practice I myself have engaged in recently). That could
    easily cross the line into a personal attack. If you just mention it
    as a mild observation, that seems okay. But the recommended practice,
    especially if you are upset about it, is not to argue it out on the list,
    but to get the moderator(s) involved, presently me.

    Hal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 24 2003 - 23:30:14 MDT