Re: Jane's on Naval `electric weapons'

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Mon Jun 23 2003 - 10:31:49 MDT

Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: The Food Timeline"

Previous message: JAY DUGGER: "Re: BOOKS: Hacking Matter"
Maybe in reply to: Phil Osborn: "Jane's on Naval `electric weapons'"
Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Jane's on Naval `electric weapons'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 6/23/2003 11:23:55 AM Central Standard Time,
duggerj1@charter.net writes: The material suggested ranges of about sixty nautical miles
(~68 miles or ~110 km) for surface targets. Bear in mind, I didn't see these
fire. Military contractors deserve their reputation for exaggerating their
products' abilities.

They have reported actual test results of slightly over 70 miles in
development. Beyound that I know not. <G>
Ron h.

Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: The Food Timeline"
Previous message: JAY DUGGER: "Re: BOOKS: Hacking Matter"
Maybe in reply to: Phil Osborn: "Jane's on Naval `electric weapons'"
Next in thread: Mike Lorrey: "Re: Jane's on Naval `electric weapons'"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 23 2003 - 10:43:05 MDT