Re: London Calling

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 23:56:56 MDT

  • Next message: Michael Wiik: "Re: [IRAQ]: cognitive dissonance"

    <<Personally, I fully expect a nuclear (not just radiological) terrorist
    attack against the US in the coming 10 - 20 years.  I believe current
    US foreign policy makes this event more likely rather than less.  So
    I'm already aghast at Bush. 

    mez>>

    I understand the anti-Bushies are appalled. Yet, what kind if foreign policy
    should we pursue., like the French? A fat lot of good appeasement has done.
    Look how, this very day, the French are busy rounding up opponents of the
    Iranian ayatollahs, in order to appease the Khomeiniacs. I don't see sweet reason
    happening in the middle east, except the sweet reason that follows effective use
    of power, including military force, as needed.

    But there is much America needs to work on, not the least an effective fuel
    policy that liberates its cars from Wahabbi oil supplies. But that is not
    strickly a Bushie flaw, this was also a flaw of Bubba Clinton, Bush Sr., Ron
    Reagan, Jimmy Carter, Ford, Nixon...all the way back to FDR. On the Arab side of the
    fence (Arabic speaking peoples) we do have lots of solar and wind energy not
    being harvested and use to help air condition Cairo off, for example. We the
    world outside this list may lack, is a lack of imagination. This list goes on.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 18 2003 - 00:06:46 MDT