RE: Why believe the truth?

From: Ramez Naam (mez@apexnano.com)
Date: Mon Jun 16 2003 - 22:36:31 MDT

  • Next message: Damien Broderick: "Re: cognitive dissonance"

    From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky [mailto:sentience@pobox.com]
    > Robin Hanson wrote:
    > > [observations on the evolutinary success of
    > > holding untrue beliefs]
    >
    > That works to the extent that:
    >
    > 1) Your sole and only goal is to reproduce statistically
    > more frequently than your contemporaries, above all
    > other considerations including individual survival.

    Not true. Consider Robin's example of a salesman who honestly believes
    that he's selling a better product. Even if the salesman isn't
    reproducing, his belief in his product is being rewarded with greater
    monetary rewards.

    It seems to me that self-deception, particularly overly optimistic
    self-assessment, is useful in any entity where efficiency of the
    mental design is an issue, and any entity which is not in 100%
    conscious control of its behavior.

    Why? Because an entity that can deceive itself can deceive others by
    leverage its abilities at communicating things it truly believes. An
    entity that cannot deceive itself must invest in additional abilities
    to become effective at deceiving others.

    Naturally, humans can do both. But it does seem that humans who can
    persuade themselves are most effective at persuading others. It also
    seems, anecdotally, that optimistic humans are more effective at
    motivating themselves, more resilient in the face of overwhelming
    odds, and in general more productive.

    An irony here is that you, Eliezer, strike me as a rather irrationally
    optimistic person[*].

    mez

    * Lest this be interpreted as an ad hominem, let me state here that I
    find a certain degree of irrational optimism a rather endearing trait,
    and an extropic one.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 16 2003 - 22:46:26 MDT