Liberals Vs Greens

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 23:19:47 MDT

  • Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: ENERGY: Singularity on hold?"

    This article can be read in full on the NY Times website. But you have to
    have your own account, or utilize the one provided by one list member, a few days
    ago (tip o' the hat for that)

    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/06/15/magazine/15WIND.html

    <<The nation's leading environmental groups can barely control their
    enthusiasm. ''We're bullish on wind,'' says Kert Davies, research director of
    Greenpeace USA. ''Everybody has to ante up in the fight.'' But like residents of
    dozens of communities where other wind-farm projects have been proposed, many Cape
    Codders have put aside their larger environmental sensitivities and are
    demanding that their home be exempt from such projects. As Cronkite puts it, ''Our
    national treasures should be off limits to industrialization.''
    Wind is the world's fastest-growing energy resource, and after a decade of
    federal and state subsidies kick-starting the industry, creating enough power
    for more than a million American families in 27 states to tap into the breeze
    when they flick on their light switches. The country's oldest turbines have been
    part of the landscape on the Altamont Pass, east of San Francisco, for two
    decades. And Texans zooming along I-10 west to El Paso top a slight rise to the
    sight of a vast field of turbines stretching across the mesa. But energy
    providers in the Northeast, with its lack of wide open spaces, have long been
    consigned to dependence on oil, coal and natural gas, with only the occasional
    small-scale wind project. Then Jim Gordon got restless. The president of Cape
    Wind, Gordon is a quixotic sort of energy executive. At the age of 22, he put
    aside his dream of becoming Francis Ford Coppola and instead started a small
    company that designed and installed heat-recovery systems for hospitals and
    factories. Ten years later, after a change in regulatory law opened a niche for
    independent power producers, he pioneered the building of natural-gas-generated
    electric plants in New England, a region long captive to highly polluting coal
    and oil. Gordon eventually developed seven power plants throughout New England
    and became a very wealthy man. But with too much ''creative juice,'' as he puts
    it, to rest on what he had already done, he went looking for the next
    challenge. Wind became his fixation. ''Imagine tapping into this inexhaustible supply
    of energy right here in our own state, lowering the cost of electricity,
    decreasing pollution, reducing reliance on foreign fuel,'' Gordon said recently as
    he paced his company's boardroom in downtown Boston. ''We're feeding oil
    cartels whose whims move our economy and our armies. With wind, we can free
    ourselves from that.'' In 1999, Gordon sold off his power plants. With a Department
    of Energy wind map in hand, he and his team began searching for a place to
    build dozens of technologically advanced turbines that would plug directly into
    the region's energy grid. If he had been building in the West, Gordon would
    have looked to the plains, what those in the wind industry call ''the Saudi
    Arabia of wind.'' It being New England, he naturally looked to the mountains. But
    while the ridges of northern Maine offered plenty of gusts, he says, the
    transmission lines out of such underpopulated areas were already clogged. His eyes
    then fell on the sea. ..>>
        



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 23:29:36 MDT