Re: META: Dishonest debate (was "cluster bombs")

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 21:16:56 MDT

  • Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: META: Dishonest debate (was "cluster bombs")"

    In a message dated 6/15/2003 10:07:49 PM Central Standard Time,
    mail@HarveyNewstrom.com writes: Nice jab. But can you buy that the above description is a
    far cry from being a communist, a terrorist, a Saddam supporter, a bin Laden
    supporter, a traitor, or a person giving comfort to the enemy during wartime?

    Harvey, if you do enough damage to the country then all of that is a
    distinction without a difference. If you, alone or in concert, can weaken the ability
    to govern enough to cause unnecessary death and injury, what difference would
    it make which of those and many other alternatives you were? So that is not
    the question. The question is how much do you hate and how much harm are you
    willing to do whether that harm is intentional or through indifference?
    Ron h.

    You seemed to accept my designating you a Bush hating Democrat so I accepted
    the term as accurate.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 21:26:40 MDT